Comments on: Mike Miller? No thanks http://bullsbythehorns.com/mike-miller-no-thanks/ Sat, 29 Aug 2015 20:25:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.3 By: ?? ????? ?? http://bullsbythehorns.com/mike-miller-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-106270 Fri, 03 Jan 2014 02:39:37 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=772#comment-106270 Hi there everybody, here every one is sharing these
knowledge, so it’s good to read this weblog, and I used to pay
a visit this webpage everyday.

]]>
By: Marcus Camby? Again, no thanks » By The Horns http://bullsbythehorns.com/mike-miller-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-4751 Wed, 20 May 2009 13:23:06 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=772#comment-4751 […] the offseason speculation continue! Now that the woeful Clippers have won the right to destroy yet another promising NBA […]

]]>
By: Anonymous http://bullsbythehorns.com/mike-miller-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-4026 Wed, 13 May 2009 17:49:07 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=772#comment-4026 there is no chance of a sign and trade unless its somewhere gordon wants to go…and im pretty sure he wants to win. i say do the deal with the wolves for miller and a pick for kirk and then try to get someone who can score inside. nobody is untouchable but rose and noah.

]]>
By: Not Qualified To Comment » Qualified Links http://bullsbythehorns.com/mike-miller-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-4021 Wed, 13 May 2009 12:31:42 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=772#comment-4021 […] Is there really Mike Miller to the Bulls talk?  For Gordon or Hinrich?  How could adding a 3rd small forward be the answer? No thanks Minnesota. [By The Horns] […]

]]>
By: rocky http://bullsbythehorns.com/mike-miller-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-3997 Wed, 13 May 2009 05:58:09 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=772#comment-3997 I’d do a sign and trade w/ Ben Gordon. So what we get hit on the cap for a year, then Mike Millers contract of 9.75 comes off the books in 2010 anyways and if they add the #18 pick then we get something in return for Ben Gordon versus losing him for nothing.

]]>
By: Colin http://bullsbythehorns.com/mike-miller-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-3859 Tue, 12 May 2009 03:22:06 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=772#comment-3859 I would’ve been all for Mike Miller until we acquired Salmons. He would’ve been a good backup big SG…. If we are planning on resigning BG, then I would rather trade him for Miller then keep him. I don’t want to give Kirk for him though.

]]>
By: jeff http://bullsbythehorns.com/mike-miller-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-3796 Mon, 11 May 2009 20:07:00 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=772#comment-3796 Another trade that would be bad for both teams. The only thing the Wolves need less than another undersized, shoot-first, non-PG would be another undersized, no-defense PF.

]]>
By: Brad http://bullsbythehorns.com/mike-miller-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-3782 Mon, 11 May 2009 17:19:46 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=772#comment-3782 What’s wrong with you Matt? Let me say this slowly just to be clear: YOU …ARE …A …BLOGGER.

Seriously, how much good material has John Salmons and Kirk Hinrich given you this year? The answer is almost none. You see, their problem is they simply play basketball too well. You can’t knock their shooting, defense, ball control or decision making with any regularity. You don’t even get very may goofy pictures (ala Mr. Noah) since they even have a decent sense of style. As a reporter/blogger, you need morons to make a story. Sure we’ll lose games, but what is that in comparison to the mileage you get out of Tyrus or Ben or …Mike Miller? Just looking at that picture gives me ideas for at least two or three good jokes!

]]>