Comments on: Game 1 Recap: Hawks 103, Bulls 95 http://bullsbythehorns.com/game-1-recap-hawks-103-bulls-95/ Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:45:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.3.1 By: inkybreath http://bullsbythehorns.com/game-1-recap-hawks-103-bulls-95/comment-page-1/#comment-42905 Wed, 04 May 2011 22:24:26 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=2954#comment-42905 So true!

Sometimes, it seems like Rose always goes so deep into the paint that there is not a good path to pass from … I think it would be good if he practiced more medium penetration to leave his options a little more open, while also reducing the chance for injury (and error).

There was the flashpoint, early in the season, when he was not getting the calls he should and he stated openly that he was not going to shy from contact. I think he may have gone a little too deep into this philosophy.

He has such a lovely medium to medium-close range game with the floaters and short-jumpers. He needs that variety in these playoffs.

]]>
By: ScottA http://bullsbythehorns.com/game-1-recap-hawks-103-bulls-95/comment-page-1/#comment-42893 Wed, 04 May 2011 12:15:13 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=2954#comment-42893 Agree with most of the comments here; Bulls could have been better, but played well enough to win against a normal Hawks team. Hawks weren’t normal; Bulls lost.

Short thought on Rose. I think his reliance on athleticism has been more noticeable the last two series. It still doesn’t hurt him that badly (he’s really, really athletic), but it cuts down on his efficiency and hurts his effectiveness as a passer. Notably – all the possessions where he jumps first and thinks second (happens at least 6 or 8 times a game); any basketball coach will tell you this is a bad idea. Rose often gets away with it, but not as easily during the playoffs.

]]>
By: BFD http://bullsbythehorns.com/game-1-recap-hawks-103-bulls-95/comment-page-1/#comment-42885 Wed, 04 May 2011 00:21:00 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=2954#comment-42885 I felt the fact that Joe Johnson was hitting crazy shots really killed our momentum and frustrated the entire team. When you preach to contesting every shot, and then you contest every shot of another team and they STILL go in…it broke our spirit a little bit.

Don’t forget, we came back and showed some life in this game in the 2nd/3rd. If JJ misses a few of those contested looks, this literally is a whole new ball game. Just have to tip your hat to them and work harder the next game. Now is not the time to panic.

]]>
By: inkybreath http://bullsbythehorns.com/game-1-recap-hawks-103-bulls-95/comment-page-1/#comment-42881 Tue, 03 May 2011 20:48:13 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=2954#comment-42881 CHEMISTRY.

This Hawks core has spent a good amount of time together and I think they understand how to flex and flow and how to keep feeding the hot hand.

They trust each other.

It may not mean as much in a regular season game, but when the focus is tightened, they are going to show it.

The Bulls are lacking in chemistry. Pure hustle can come across sloppy when it is not guided by chemistry and trust. Now that the stakes are playoff-raised, the trust has to be reintroduced on the fly and it hasn’t happened so naturally.

The Pacers displayed an amazing combination of hustle and chemistry in our series. We often tried to match it, but it mostly came across as sloppy.

I don’t think anyone should be mad at Matt for being totally honest about the Bulls chances. What have they shown us? We barely pulled out three games against a feisty and inferior opponent and we dropped a deuce on our home court against a quality, veteran team. Based on the results, we have reason to be worried.

This team cannot win pretending to be the best team in the league. It has to go back to the all-out team that is still trying to prove itself.

]]>
By: ORD http://bullsbythehorns.com/game-1-recap-hawks-103-bulls-95/comment-page-1/#comment-42879 Tue, 03 May 2011 20:22:08 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=2954#comment-42879 At those saying you’re not worried, just game 1 – that’s what the Orlando fans said, too. Don’t take Atlanta lightly. “Just one game” turned into 4 for Orlando.

]]>
By: Mark S. http://bullsbythehorns.com/game-1-recap-hawks-103-bulls-95/comment-page-1/#comment-42878 Tue, 03 May 2011 19:50:06 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=2954#comment-42878 Couldn’t agree more with this, spot on. We need to come out with another level of intensity, like Grandpa Noah is in the stands. I never saw that kind of intensity in this game, we were just going through the motions.

Also: where was the fluid offense we saw in Game 5 vs. Indiana last night? Our passing lanes weren’t there, nobody was moving without the ball, it was ugly basketball offensively.

]]>
By: Dennis-from GA http://bullsbythehorns.com/game-1-recap-hawks-103-bulls-95/comment-page-1/#comment-42877 Tue, 03 May 2011 19:46:29 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=2954#comment-42877 I stated that no one was giving us a chance.. Hawks aren’t contenders..hmmm really 4 years in a row in the playoffs lost to (Boston, Cleveland, Orlando) we were not beaten no scrubs. Write us off for game 2 … Please! This was not an accident, we have been developing this team for years our coach is just doing what the former coach didn’t. Going beyond 2 or 3 players on the bench. Is game 2 a must win for the bulls? Can they go to ATL 0-2 and win the series? We are not contenders but like I said .. we weren’t here by accident!

]]>
By: The Rock http://bullsbythehorns.com/game-1-recap-hawks-103-bulls-95/comment-page-1/#comment-42876 Tue, 03 May 2011 19:45:16 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=2954#comment-42876 Lack of experience is very noticeable as well as a second option in scoring. Deng was attacking early and had a good game, Boozer played better, but they just dont seem consistent enough. Boozer is slow on defense and even on offense just looks sluggish. Their turnovers early on looked very Indiana-ish. The Bulls at one point in the 3rd quarter looked to have control of the game and then just an epic collapse. I hope they use the full they did when they blew the 20 pt lead during the regular season and just anihilated ATL in the next game putting 72 up at halftime. But Rose wont be 100% and in order for the Bulls to have a shot someone has to step up and be a consistent 2nd option on offense. I went from thinking this series being over in 5 games to now feeling it will be 7, and it can go either way. Matt, you are right on the 50% chance for ATL. People slept on them, just as they did against Indiana which we all know could have gone lopsided if it werent for those 4th quarter rallies. Bulls need to step it up NOW and GAME 2 is a must win, because say Chicago does get out of this series, this sloppy play just wont fly against Miami or Boston.

]]>
By: Chi Fan http://bullsbythehorns.com/game-1-recap-hawks-103-bulls-95/comment-page-1/#comment-42874 Tue, 03 May 2011 18:38:04 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=2954#comment-42874 The Bulls really didn’t play that bad, and if contested permiter jump shots consitute “any shot they wanted”, then you are correct. Let’s be real here, hawks players not named Joe Johnson shot 46% from the field and 25% from the three. There is no way he shoots like he did in another game this series, he didn’t even take a single shot with-in 9 feet of the basket. That is not sustainable production.

The only problems I have are the Bulls didn’t make two adjustments: 1) try harder to deny the ball to JJ when he was consistently hitting shots, like the pacers started doing to Rose last series, and 2) adjust to the fact that the referees were letting them play tonight, as evidenced by the low foul calls on both teams.

]]>
By: Inception http://bullsbythehorns.com/game-1-recap-hawks-103-bulls-95/comment-page-1/#comment-42873 Tue, 03 May 2011 18:29:54 +0000 http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=2954#comment-42873 @Savage – Ditto.

they got some growing to do.

]]>