<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It really was &#8220;The Big Easy&#8221;&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bullsbythehorns.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=218</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:22:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Henry</title>
		<link>http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=218&#038;cpage=1#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=218#comment-126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is with the hornets, anyway? I understand losing chris paul is huge, but they weren&#039;t playing as well as last year before that, so what&#039;s wrong?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is with the hornets, anyway? I understand losing chris paul is huge, but they weren&#8217;t playing as well as last year before that, so what&#8217;s wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=218&#038;cpage=1#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=218#comment-125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They haven&#039;t had a winning road trip since the 97-98 season!? Holy shit!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They haven&#8217;t had a winning road trip since the 97-98 season!? Holy shit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McHale</title>
		<link>http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=218&#038;cpage=1#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McHale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=218#comment-123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RemyRem -- True enough. They&#039;ve obviously struggled in prior weeks closing out the stinkers. But now that Luol and Captain Kirk are back, Vinny has settled into a set rotation and they chemistry is finally there. Hopefully once Drew Gooden is healthy and gets worked back into the mix, the team can put a decent string of wins together. Something like 12 or 13 out of 20 would be nice, and would probably put them into playoff position. They&#039;re 10th in the East right now.

Peter Clayton A. Smith -- I think you make an excellent point, and so did Eric Snow. Even bad shooters like Kidd and Rose can get on a roll when their defenders cheat on them. It&#039;s lazy defense, and it will cost a team wins. You&#039;ll notice the better defensive teams -- Boston, Cleveland, San Antonio, etc. -- rarely cheat. They always try to challenge shots. It&#039;s a little extra effort, but man it pays off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RemyRem &#8212; True enough. They&#8217;ve obviously struggled in prior weeks closing out the stinkers. But now that Luol and Captain Kirk are back, Vinny has settled into a set rotation and they chemistry is finally there. Hopefully once Drew Gooden is healthy and gets worked back into the mix, the team can put a decent string of wins together. Something like 12 or 13 out of 20 would be nice, and would probably put them into playoff position. They&#8217;re 10th in the East right now.</p>
<p>Peter Clayton A. Smith &#8212; I think you make an excellent point, and so did Eric Snow. Even bad shooters like Kidd and Rose can get on a roll when their defenders cheat on them. It&#8217;s lazy defense, and it will cost a team wins. You&#8217;ll notice the better defensive teams &#8212; Boston, Cleveland, San Antonio, etc. &#8212; rarely cheat. They always try to challenge shots. It&#8217;s a little extra effort, but man it pays off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Clayton A. Smith</title>
		<link>http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=218&#038;cpage=1#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Clayton A. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=218#comment-119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The one thing that stood out for me last night in the game was how the Hornets decided to defend Derrick Rose, their goal was to seemingly make sure he didn&#039;t get into the middle off the dribble.  Off pick and rolls they dared Derrick to take his jump shot by going underneath the screens instead of trying to fight through them on the high side, and Derrick hit the shots all game.

He only ended the game with three layups out of his fourteen shots, and the shot chart shows about five shots coming off what look like the Hornets going underneath a screen.  This made me think about what his shooting percentage is when a team does this, and dares him to shoot the ball.  I doubt 82games has the statistics that say New Orleans went underneath a screen and then this happened, but they would be interesting to see.  Unfortunately the PBPs don&#039;t help much with that.

To go with that last night on NBA TV they were talking in the studio about teams, not specifically the Hornets with Derrick Rose, but more teams doing the same thing with Jason Kidd, going underneath screens on the high pick and roll and leaving bad shooters &quot;open&quot;.  Eric Snow said that you needed to still pressure them and put a hand in their face because if you didn&#039;t you let someone like Kidd or Rose read the floor and do what they are best at.  It made sense to me, but I don&#039;t know what the numbers back up in terms of how to defend the pick and roll with Rose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing that stood out for me last night in the game was how the Hornets decided to defend Derrick Rose, their goal was to seemingly make sure he didn&#8217;t get into the middle off the dribble.  Off pick and rolls they dared Derrick to take his jump shot by going underneath the screens instead of trying to fight through them on the high side, and Derrick hit the shots all game.</p>
<p>He only ended the game with three layups out of his fourteen shots, and the shot chart shows about five shots coming off what look like the Hornets going underneath a screen.  This made me think about what his shooting percentage is when a team does this, and dares him to shoot the ball.  I doubt 82games has the statistics that say New Orleans went underneath a screen and then this happened, but they would be interesting to see.  Unfortunately the PBPs don&#8217;t help much with that.</p>
<p>To go with that last night on NBA TV they were talking in the studio about teams, not specifically the Hornets with Derrick Rose, but more teams doing the same thing with Jason Kidd, going underneath screens on the high pick and roll and leaving bad shooters &#8220;open&#8221;.  Eric Snow said that you needed to still pressure them and put a hand in their face because if you didn&#8217;t you let someone like Kidd or Rose read the floor and do what they are best at.  It made sense to me, but I don&#8217;t know what the numbers back up in terms of how to defend the pick and roll with Rose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RemyRem</title>
		<link>http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=218&#038;cpage=1#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>RemyRem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bullsbythehorns.com/?p=218#comment-118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice analogy.  Too bad the Bulls don&#039;t kill weaker teams with more consistency.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analogy.  Too bad the Bulls don&#8217;t kill weaker teams with more consistency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
